Precertification/Authorization/Notification Absent

What it means

The payer denied this claim because it has no record of receiving the required prior authorization, precertification, or notification before the service was performed. Even if the service itself was medically necessary, the claim is being rejected on a procedural basis because the required approval step wasn't completed or documented.

Common causes

Service was rendered without obtaining prior authorization when the payer requires it
Authorization was obtained but not properly linked or referenced on the claim
Authorization request was submitted but not approved before the date of service
Wrong authorization number was entered on the claim
Authorization was obtained for a different procedure, provider, or date of service than what was billed
Notification requirement (e.g., admission notification within 24-48 hours) was missed
Authorization was obtained by the wrong party (e.g., referring provider instead of rendering provider)

How to fix it

Check the patient's account and payer portal to confirm whether an authorization was actually obtained for the date of service and procedure billed
If authorization exists, resubmit or appeal the claim with the correct authorization number clearly referenced
If authorization was never obtained, contact the payer to ask whether retroactive or late authorization is possible
Verify the authorization matches the exact CPT/HCPCS code, provider, place of service, and date of service billed
Review internal workflows to confirm authorization was requested and confirmed before the service was scheduled or performed
Document all communication with the payer regarding the authorization status for the appeal file

Appeal / resubmit

If you have proof that authorization was requested and approved prior to the service (such as a confirmation number, fax confirmation, or payer portal screenshot), include this documentation directly in your appeal. If authorization was never obtained, check the payer's policy for retroactive authorization or peer-to-peer review options, especially for urgent or emergency services where prior authorization may not have been feasible. Clearly state in the appeal letter why the standard authorization process could not be followed, if applicable.

Related codes

Frequently asked

Does this mean the service wasn't medically necessary?

No. Code 197 is strictly about missing procedural authorization or notification, not about whether the service itself was appropriate or necessary.

Can this denial be fixed after the service has already been provided?

Sometimes. Some payers allow retroactive or late authorization in specific circumstances, such as emergencies, but this varies by payer and plan, so it's important to check the specific policy.

Who is responsible for obtaining the authorization?

This depends on the payer and service type. It's often the rendering provider's office, but in some cases a referring provider or facility is responsible. Reviewing the payer's specific requirements can clarify this.

More free billing tools: all denial codes · denial lookup · Medicare fee calculator

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute billing or legal advice. Always verify current requirements with the specific payer.